IRS Can't Use Mistaken But Good Faith Belief That Debt Hadn't Been Discharged

June 14, 2018

Summarized by DAVID BAKER, Law Office of David G. Baker

Case Type:

Consumer

Case Status:

Affirmed

Citation:

17-1601 (1st Circuit, Jun 07,2018) Published

Tag(s):

1st Circuit, Discharge/Dischargeability, Bankruptcy Taxation, 362, 524, 727

Ruling:

Under 26 USC § 7433(e), the IRS's good faith belief that it has a right to collect the purportedly discharged debts is not relevant to determining whether it "willfully violate[d]" the discharge order.

Procedural context:

Appellee Murphy claimed that the IRS had violated the discharge injunction when it attempted to collect tax debts without first obtaining a determination from the bankruptcy court that the taxes were not discharged. IRS contended that Murphy filed a fraudulent return(s) or willfully attempted to evade or defeat the tax.

Facts:

On October 13, 2005, Murphy filed a Chapter 7 petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maine. On Schedule E of his bankruptcy petition, Murphy listed his income tax obligations to the IRS for the years of 1993-1998, 2000, 2001, and 2003, as well as a 2003 tax obligation to the Maine Revenue Services. After several collection attempts, including levies, Murphy filed an adversary proceeding for a declaration that the taxes had been discharged. There were indications that the IRS attorney was suffering from what appeared to be Alzheimer's disease and didn't represent the IRS properly. Nevertheless, the bankruptcy court found for Murphy and was affirmed by the District Court. Over dissent, the First Circuit affirmed, finding inter alia that sovereign immunity did not protect the IRS since it was waived in the statute, 26 USC § 7433(e). Murphy apparently was awarded $175.000 in damages.

Judge(s):

Stahl and Souter in the majority, and Lynch dissenting.

Previous Video

Landlord/Tenant Issues in Retail Bankruptcy

David R. Kuney of Whiteford Taylor Preston talks about the rapidly shifting landscape of the retail world a...

Representations to Your Representation: Pre-Argument Preview of Lamar, Archer & Cofrin LLP v. Appling

"[...]expect more adversary proceedings about what a debtor “obtained” from a creditor and the amount of in...

Return to Home

Insolvency news at your fingertips.

IRS Can't Use Mistaken But Good Faith Belief That Debt Hadn't Been Discharged

Previous Video

Next Article

IRS Can't Use Mistaken But Good Faith Belief That Debt Hadn't Been Discharged

Previous Video

Next Article

Other content in this Stream

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is the largest tax law overhaul since 1986, and trustees, debtors and their professionals should be aware of how these changes might affect bankruptcy estates.

David R. Kuney of Whiteford Taylor Preston talks about the rapidly shifting landscape of the retail world and issues for practitioners to be aware of in handling landlord or tenant rights.

"[...]expect more adversary proceedings about what a debtor “obtained” from a creditor and the amount of information the creditor has about the debtor’s financial condition"

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 may have a significant impact on after-tax cash flow in the years following an emergence from chapter 11.

Idaho Bankruptcy Court recently ruled in In re CVAH Inc. that a trustee can “step into the shoes” of the IRS and utilize the transfer avoidance powers within both the FDCPA and the IRC.

[T]here are a number of provisions that restructuring lawyers should be aware of in the once-in-a-generation tax reform bill signed by President Trump on Dec. 22, 2017.

Not many founders of a new business consider, at the time the new business is founded, the potential U.S. federal income tax consequences to them should the new business fail.

In re DBSI Inc., offers new precedent that swings the balance back toward debtors and general unsecured creditors at the expense of the IRS.

ABI Deputy Executive Director Amy Quackenboss talks with David Cox of Cox Law Group and Elizabeth Gunn of the Office of the Virginia Attorney General about their new consumer book.

Section 727(b) of the Bankruptcy Code provides for the discharge of debts that arose prior to the petition date.

How will changing a government's compensation and benefits approach more efficiently utilize taxpayer resources? And what other low-cost steps can be taken to meet government job requirements?

A recent decision by the Seventh Circuit, purchasers of real property through tax sales conducted by certain states may begin to doubt the benefits of such an investment.

District judge refuses to give automatic stay protection to a tax evader.

There are circumstances when taxpayers should be able to discharge debt from untimely returns.

In an increasingly global world hastened by rapid technological advances, dishonest taxpayers now have more means at their disposal than ever before to evade lawful state taxes.

A debtor’s right to overpayments as of the date that a bankruptcy case is filed becomes property of the estate — even if the debtor elects to apply such overpayments to a future tax return.

Puerto Rico judge sides with the Third Circuit by upholding the Anti-Injunction Act in bankruptcy cases.

To help bankruptcy trustees in their administration of asset cases, we offer a high-level view of some common — but complex — tax issues.